Major football tournaments create a rare period when millions of people follow the same schedule. Matches dominate media coverage and everyday conversations, which gives gambling brands a valuable opportunity to attract users.
The 2026 event produced a far less predictable picture. Eight of the ten countries with the fastest rise in iGaming branded searches had no national team at the competition. Across comparable geographies, the combined index increased by only 1.8% over the full 39-day window.

The study by Blask, a market analytics platform, used two equal windows of 39 days. Its tournament period ran from 11 June through 19 July 2026, while the baseline covered 3 May through 10 June. The organiser presented the results through its branded search-demand index, expressed in points. The indicator aggregates online searches for iGaming companies within individual countries. Its methodology filters away irrelevant activity and searches with negative intent and normalises the remaining information.
This measurement offers a view of consumer interest in gambling brands. Geographic coverage also needs a clear disclaimer. The participant set included only countries whose national teams were covered by the service.
The main exclusions:
These gaps mean that the comparison covers available participating geographies, not every member of the 48-team field. The consolidated UK entry also prevents a separate assessment of the English and Scottish audiences.
The organiser’s earlier study applied a similar lens to the 2018 and 2022 competitions. No stable connection appeared between iGaming interest and sporting performance. The latest figures extend that pattern through strong gains in absent countries and early-exit markets.
Relative change produced the clearest surprise in the data. The highest positions were concentrated among countries outside the tournament, and several more than doubled their earlier levels. Even with that limitation, the geographic spread reveals that World Cup attention extended well beyond the national teams playing in North America.
Country-by-country results:
Peru deserves particular attention because its starting volume was far above the levels recorded in Iceland or Costa Rica. A 95.8% expansion from such a large base represents a very different commercial signal from a dramatic movement in a smaller geography.
Raw index points change the order as they give greater weight to countries with established search volumes. The results show where the largest quantity of additional brand interest appeared.
Iceland and Costa Rica disappeared from the leading group under this measurement. Their relative jumps remained impressive, although the added totals stayed below those of several bigger geographies.
An extra 31.7 million points placed the South American country far ahead of every other geography. Its nearest rival added less than one-third of that amount. The combination of a 95.8% jump and a sizeable baseline made this the clearest large-scale response in the entire comparison. This result also shows the limits of relative movement as a stand-alone measure. Peru ranked fifth by percentage, yet it became first once additional volume determined the order.
Germany added 10 million points and finished second overall. This made Germany the top-performing participating country by absolute volume, even though Paraguay eliminated the team on penalties in the Round of 32. The German case illustrates the link between market size and event-level attention. Its 52.7% rise was smaller than the jumps recorded in Panama or Japan, but the baseline of 19 million produced much more added activity.
Seven of the ten positions still belonged to countries without a team at the competition. Vietnam ranked third with 8.8 million points, Argentina contributed 7.9 million, and Chile added 7,300,000. Indonesia came next with 6.2 million, followed by Ecuador at 4.4 million. Poland gained 3,700,000, and Georgia completed the top ten with 3,200,000. Germany and Argentina were two of the three represented countries. Ecuador completed that small group, which left non-qualifiers in most of the leading positions.
The two measurements answer separate business questions. Relative movement identifies a fast shift compared with prior conditions. Added volume shows where the event created the greatest quantity of new branded searches.
A smaller geography may suit a focused market test when its percentage jump is exceptional. A larger country can support broader acquisition activity if the absolute addition justifies the required budget. Both measures create a firmer basis for regional planning.
A narrower view of qualified countries created another mismatch. Several early exits recorded stronger increases than teams that reached the quarter-finals. This participant-only comparison weakens the idea that each victory should generate a proportional commercial response.
Key contrasts show the weak correlation with sporting success:
Germany placed sixth among the qualifying markets with a 52.7% rise, and Ecuador followed at 38.5%. Ivory Coast recorded 28.2%. Norway and Switzerland completed the ten strongest participants, although both had progressed further than several rivals above them.
These cases show that success on the pitch could support attention in some countries, but sporting outcomes did not determine the overall ranking. Audience size and existing brand awareness also affected the totals. Local gambling conditions may add another layer, though the index leaves the precise weight of each factor unknown.
Earlier comparisons reached a similar conclusion. France won in 2018 and did not lead the largest search-demand markets, while Argentina, the eventual 2022 champion, entered the competition with a far smaller index than Brazil. The latest edition therefore continued a pattern visible across successive cycles.

Canada lost to Morocco on 4 July, and Mexico went out against England on 5 July. The United States followed on the sixth with a defeat to Belgium. All three co-hosts had reached the Round of 16, which created a useful test of how local search behaviour changed once their teams were eliminated. Their cumulative totals were relatively similar across the full tournament window. Daily trajectories then diverged, producing a distinct post-exit profile for each country.
Demand broadly followed the local team and continued falling after 6 July. The full-period figure also declined compared with the May to June baseline.
This matches an earlier trend: US user interest had already fallen by 9% year over year during the first half of 2026, while projected revenue decreased by 1.8%.
Search activity remained closer to its tournament-period level after the national team was eliminated. The country remained above its preceding 39-day baseline and held a larger part of the audience through the later rounds. This trajectory sits between the American decline and the Canadian increase. Local conditions still shaped how the shared event affected each geography.
Interest rose after the exit and stayed elevated into the middle of July. The equal-period comparison also placed the country above its May to June starting point. Canada entered the competition as a large but fragmented iGaming geography. Offshore brands accounted for 59.4% of projected H1 2026 revenue, while locally regulated businesses represented 40.6%. Such structural differences help explain why identical tournament milestones can produce contrasting market curves.
A major football event can widen the acquisition window beyond countries represented on the pitch. Strong opportunities may appear in neighbouring geographies with no local team to support. The findings also favour active country-level monitoring throughout a tournament. Pre-event forecasts based on qualification and expected progression can miss sudden movement elsewhere.
How operators can apply the findings:
These applications matter for established brands and new entrants. A mature operator may refine allocation, while a newer company can identify places that deserve closer research.
A 1.8% increase across comparable geographies appears modest next to the sharp movements recorded in individual countries. The largest relative and absolute gains also came from markets without a team, which weakens the value of bracket-based forecasting. Local behaviour throughout the full event cycle therefore deserves closer attention from operators.
Key nuances from the data:
Long-term value will become clearer after normal sporting calendars return and tournament searches lose their temporary boost. Post-event retention data can then show which countries developed a durable audience.
Check the information used to contact us carefully. It is necessary for your safety.
Fraudsters can use contacts that look like ours to scam customers. Therefore, we ask you to enter only the addresses that are indicated on our official website.
Be careful! Our team is not responsible for the activities of persons using similar contact details.